H.R. 67 — Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory Review

<1%becomes law high confidencepending: House reported

Modernizing Retrospective Regulatory Review — would clear the House (92%) but only <1% to ever get the vote.

<1%

reaches a floor vote

98%

passes if voted (stage model)

37%

survives downstream

<1%

becomes law

The gap: on the floor this would pass — 92% by the member-vote simulation — but the floor is the hard part: <1% to ever get the vote. That gap, not the whip count, is the story.

If it reaches the floor

majority

Projected 290 yea of 430 voting; 90% interval 205–412 (quartiles 215–380). Intervals are backtest-verified to cover ~90%.

By floor procedure

No vote is scheduled, so the headline marginalizes over how the House would take it up; the branches:

Procedure	Likelihood	Projected yea	Passes
passage	38%	262 [202–395]	88%
suspension	62%	307 [208–414]	95%

Receipts

Sponsor: Andy Biggs (R). Latest action (2025-05-21): Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 24 - 18.
Full record: Congress.gov.

Forecast run predict-20260606T193507Z · models member-vote-1.0.0-t117d118-20260606 + passage-1.0.0-t117d118-20260606 · conditional whip forecasts for the Senate run at moderate confidence (why).